Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42029027›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

Navigating GenAI in assessment design with supercharging and proofing.

Kabir Bhalla, Christine M Goedhart, Eden Fussner-Dupas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kabir BhallaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7645-3725
Christine M GoedhartDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Eden Fussner-DupasDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of generative AI (GenAI) has introduced a shift in higher education, reshaping how instructors approach teaching, how students engage with learning, and, most importantly, how learning is assessed. As these technologies become increasingly integrated into educational contexts, established assumptions about assessment design are being actively questioned. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of differing perspectives on GenAI integration in assessment design. We introduce the AI-supercharging and AI-proofing (ASAP) framework as a practical approach to rethinking assessments in ways that maintain and prioritize core learning objectives while leveraging GenAI to deepen student learning. We describe the design and implementation of a faculty-facing workshop that uses this framework to foster reflective conversations about assessment and academic integrity and provide facilitation resources and examples that others can adapt in their own contexts. We describe our evaluation of the workshop efficacy and share observations of how these workshops lead to shifts in faculty perspective. The workshop inspires enhanced willingness to adopt GenAI and leads to a more positive, nuanced view of its use in the classroom. We also discuss lessons learned from facilitating these workshops and fostering productive, reflective discussions within teaching and learning communities. In addition, we provide a guided worksheet designed to support educators who are hesitant about adopting AI, offering a step-by-step resource for rethinking an assessment. Our experiences suggest that engaging with the ASAP framework supports educators in redesigning more meaningful, well-aligned assessments while integrating GenAI thoughtfully and moving beyond initial hesitancy.

Indexed as

assessmentGenAILLM

Identifiers

PMID42029027
PMCPMC13520687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.