ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2026
Functional Unit-Based Analysis Unveils the Skeletal Mandibular Effects of Class II Elastics Therapy in Adolescents.
Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study sought to thoroughly assess the skeletal impacts of Class II elastics therapy on the developing mandible, highlighting three-dimensional changes in its functional units.
methodsTreatment records of 140 CBCT scans from 70 adolescent patients were retrospectively collected and assigned to one of two groups: the Class II elastics group (n = 35), in which class II elastics were performed on the stainless steel archwires for more than 12 months, and the control group (n = 35). Pre- and post-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were used to assess changes related to the skeletal facial pattern, functional units, and transverse parameters. An independent t-test was used to compare between the two groups.
resultsIn the Class II elastics group, the mandibular body unit length (IAF-MF) increased by 3.09 ± 3.16 mm from pre- to post-treatment, significantly larger than that in the control group (1.37 ± 3.14 mm). No other mandibular functional unit or transverse parameters demonstrated significant differences between the two groups.
conclusionsBased on the single-center sample included in this study, the adolescent group receiving prolonged Class II elastics may have exhibited a greater increase in mandibular body unit length compared to the group with minimal elastic use. However, these findings cannot be generalized without further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.