Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028835›Full record

ReviewWomen's health (London, England)

A narrative review of the effectiveness of pain management strategies during intrauterine device insertion and endometrial biopsies.

Nora Shero, Manon Denis-LeBlanc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nora SheroDepartment of Family Medicine, Montfort Hospital, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-8255-4562
Manon Denis-LeBlancDepartment of Family Medicine, Montfort Hospital, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-1289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of pain management techniques are currently used during gynecological procedures in outpatient settings to help improve patient comfort and satisfaction. The most common pharmacological methods include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, lidocaine gel, lidocaine spray, and paracervical blocks. Moreover, noninvasive techniques such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and verbal analgesia have been shown to help reduce pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertions and endometrial biopsies (EMB). More recently, Penthrox, an inhaled analgesic, is another promising new option for pain control in primary care practice. Despite the variety of available techniques, there are limited recent data evaluating the comparative efficacy of these pain management strategies during IUD insertions and EMB. Several factors play a significant role in pain perception. For example, parous women tend to have a higher tolerance for pain and report lower pain scores than nulliparous women who have not given birth and are more likely to experience cervical stenosis. This gap in evidence highlights the need for ongoing research and the development of accessible, evidence-based interventions in primary healthcare settings to enhance patient experiences and satisfaction with these common procedures. Patient education about the procedure, its benefits, and potential side effects, and providing additional counseling can help alleviate anxiety and contribute to better overall outcomes, and in turn, reduce pain.

Indexed as

EndometriumIntrauterine DevicesPain ManagementAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiopsyFemaleHumansPainPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidalendometrial biopsyintrauterine devicespain managementpatient anxietypatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42028835
PMCPMC13125793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.