ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders
Narrative Ability in Swedish Children Treated for Posterior Fossa Tumours: Macro- and Microstructural Performance Before and 1-4 Weeks After Surgery.
Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPosterior fossa tumours (PFT), among the most common childhood brain tumours, place children at risk of speech, language, and communication difficulties, often described in relation to cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) but also seen in children without mutism. Narrative ability refers to the capacity to understand, create, and share stories. Narratives can be analysed at the macrostructural level, capturing structure and content, and the microstructural level, reflecting, for example, morphosyntax and lexicon. Narrative ability has not previously been investigated in children with PFT at both levels, including pre- and postoperative data, or in relation to CMS or dysarthria.
aimsThe aims were to investigate narrative ability at macrostructural and microstructural levels in children with PFT compared with typically developing (TD) peers, to investigate pre- to postoperative changes at both levels in children with PFT, and to examine relations between macro- and microstructure and the presence of CMS and dysarthria.
methodsA story-generation task from the Expression, Reception and Recall of Narrative Instrument (ERRNI) was administered pre- and postoperatively, in the early postoperative phase (1-4 weeks after surgery). Macrostructure was analysed using ideascore, and microstructure using mean length of utterance in words (MLUw), grammaticality (GY), subordination index (SI), lexical diversity (MATTR), and words per minute (WPM). Group comparisons and associations with CMS and dysarthria were analysed using linear regressions, and changes over time with mixed-effects models.
resultsChildren with PFT scored significantly lower than TD peers on the macrostructural measure ideascore and on several microstructural measures, including MLUw, GY, and WPM, both pre- and postoperatively (all p < 0.05). SI and MATTR did not differ between groups. Difficulties were most pronounced among older children. No significant pre- to postoperative changes were found, although individual variability was evident. The small group of children with CMS did not differ significantly from other children with PFT, while those with postoperative dysarthria showed a decline in both macro- and microstructure (p < 0.05).
conclusionsChildren with PFT showed pre- and postoperative difficulties at macro- and microstructural levels, producing narratives with fewer story elements, shorter utterances, and more grammatical errors compared with TD peers. The age-related differences suggest that narrative difficulties become more prominent as language and cognitive demands increase. The findings underline the clinical importance of including narrative tasks encompassing macro- and microstructural aspects, together with motor-speech evaluation, in assessment and follow-up of children treated for PFT to guide appropriate interventions. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: What is already known on this subject Previous studies have described speech, language and/or communication difficulties following posterior fossa tumour surgery, particularly in association with cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS). One aspect of language that may be affected is narrative ability, which can be analysed at two levels: the macrostructural level (content) and the microstructural level (form). Still, little is known about narrative ability in children with posterior fossa tumours (PFT), although a small study based on postoperative data has shown microstructural difficulties in children undergoing PFT surgery. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Our study adds new knowledge about language profiles in children with PFT, showing that they have narrative difficulties at macro- as well as at microstructural levels, present both pre- and postoperatively. These difficulties are most evident among older children and show individual variability. We did not find more pronounced difficulties in the small group of children with CMS compared with the other children undergoing PFT surgery. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings underline the importance of including narrative assessment in the evaluation and follow-up of children treated for PFT. Assessing macro- and microstructural aspects together with motor-speech evaluation can help identify children in need of interventions. Regular follow-up assessments are essential, as narrative difficulties may become more apparent as language and cognitive demands increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.