Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028561›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026

An insight into the experience of healthcare providers and users of women-friendly health services in Jordan-a mixed method study.

Eman Zmaily Dahmash, Ali Al-Gharabli, Thaira Al-Madi, Rahma Jebreel, Ahmad Shatat, Worood Al Khob, Reem Al-Reyati, Wafaa Shariedeh, Walaa Shqerat, Ghada Alsaad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eman Zmaily DahmashFaculty of Pharmacy, Isra University, Amman, Jordan.
Ali Al-GharabliSexual Reproductive Health Programme, UNFPA in Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Thaira Al-MadiDepartment of Accreditation, Healthcare Accreditation Council, Amman, Jordan.
Rahma JebreelHealth Care Department, ational Woman's Health Care Centre, Amman, Jordan.
Ahmad ShatatDepartment of Accreditation, Healthcare Accreditation Council, Amman, Jordan.
Worood Al KhobDepartment of Accreditation, Healthcare Accreditation Council, Amman, Jordan.
Reem Al-ReyatiHealth Care Department, ational Woman's Health Care Centre, Amman, Jordan.
Wafaa ShariedehDirectorate of Professional Training and Planning, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
Walaa ShqeratDirectorate of Nursing and Allied Medical Profession, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
Ghada AlsaadStudies and Planning Department, National Woman's Health Care Centre, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women's Friendly Health Services (WFHS) are designed to be available, accessible, and affordable for women, providing care throughout their lives from youth to postmenopausal stages. These integrated services focus on women's needs, follow evidence-based practices, and are provided by a qualified and trained team. In 2022, Jordan took the initiative and implemented a WFHS in 9 primary health centres aiming at improving healthcare services for women across the life. However, there is limited data on WFHS in Jordan. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of healthcare providers (HCP) and users with women-friendly healthcare services in Jordan and to explore the challenges encountered in implementing this initiative. Methods: This study involved a qualitative approach utilising semi-structured focus group discussions with 18 HCPs at piloted WFHS providing centres. Additionally, a quantitative was conducted with women utilising the WFHS in the piloted centres using a questionnaire. Results: The analysis of the focus group discussions revealed key themes with several subthemes: high staff turnover, limited resources, and the need for additional integrated services. A survey of 393 women across 9 pilot centres showed generally positive perceptions of WFHS with high scores for respect and dignity (86%) and overall service quality (81.4%). The questionnaire was highly reliable (Cronbach alpha = 0.915). Nevertheless, women identified issues with staff greetings, and the lack of designated breastfeeding and diaper changing areas. WFHS was well-perceived by women, with discrimination-free care scoring the highest at 4.65 ± 0.592 (93%) and timely care scoring the lowest at 3.44 ± 1.125 (68.8%). Additionally, waiting time was identified as the main drawback to WFHS, scoring the lowest among all WFHS-friendly care-related questions at 3.16 ± 1.354 (63.2%). Conclusions: The findings from the two methods aligned, revealing that HCP and women shared similar concerns. While the WFHS were well-received by participants and is seen as a positive initiative, further efforts are required to enhance and scale this initiative across Jordan and other Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Offering integrated and respectful care can improve healthcare utilisation and reflect high-quality service delivery.

Indexed as

integrated servicesJordanlow-middle-income countriesprimary healthcaresatisfactionwomen friendly health services

Identifiers

PMID42028561
PMCPMC13099807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.