Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028518›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block for Surgical Planning in Multilevel Cervical Disc Disease: A Technical Report.

King Hei Stanley Lam, Yonghyun Yoon, Daniel Chiung-Jui Su, Anwar Suhaimi, Teinny Suryadi, Abdallah El-Sayed Allam, Manal Hassanien

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05145530 (Selective Nerve Root Block With Ultrasound Guidance Improves Surgical Outcome of Selective Discectomy in Patients With Multilevel Cervical Disc Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05145530 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Selective Nerve Root Block With Ultrasound Guidance Improves Surgical Outcome of Selective Discectomy in Patients With Multilevel Cervical Disc Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsSelective Nerve Root Block, Selective DiscectomyArmsselective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), SNRB+ selective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

King Hei Stanley LamFaculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, HKG.
Yonghyun YoonOrthopedics, International Academy of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Hongkong, HKG.
Daniel Chiung-Jui SuPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, TWN.
Anwar SuhaimiRehabilitation Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Teinny SuryadiPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Synergy Clinic, Jakarta, IDN.
Abdallah El-Sayed AllamMorphological Madrid Research Center (MoMaRC), UltraDissection Spain EchoTraining School, Madrid, ESP.
Manal HassanienRheumatology, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, EGY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate surgical level in patients with multilevel cervical disc disease remains challenging when relying solely on clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Fluoroscopy-guided selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) carry risks of vascular injury from inadvertent intra-arterial injection. This technical report describes the technical aspects of ultrasound-guided SNRB for preoperative surgical-level localization and provides a reproducible protocol for clinical implementation. The procedure utilizes a high-frequency (12 MHz) linear transducer with color/power Doppler capability. Transverse process morphology guides level identification: C7 exhibits a rudimentary anterior tubercle with a prominent posterior tubercle; C6 displays a sharp, prominent anterior tubercle; and C3-C5 demonstrate the characteristic "two-humped camel" sign. The vertebral artery is identified anterior to C7 and confirmed with Doppler. Using an in-plane posterolateral to anteromedial approach, a 25-gauge needle is advanced toward the oval hypoechoic nerve root between the anterior and posterior tubercles (or anterior to the posterior tubercle for C7). After negative aspiration, 1 mL of 1% lidocaine is injected. For multilevel assessment, sequential blocks are performed, with a minimum of four-hour intervals between injections, blocking from caudal to cephalad. A positive response is defined as ≥50% reduction in arm pain on the Visual Analog Scale at 30 minutes post-injection. This technique was developed and validated during a randomized controlled trial (NCT05145530), whose clinical outcomes have been published separately. The present technical report focuses on the procedural aspects. Ultrasound guidance enabled consistent visualization of target nerve roots in all 30 intervention patients (72 blocks). Power Doppler identified radicular arteries adjacent to nerve roots in 25% of procedures, allowing trajectory adjustment to avoid vascular puncture. No procedure-related complications occurred. The sequential block protocol successfully identified symptomatic levels in all patients, demonstrating the feasibility of the technique to inform surgical planning. Ultrasound-guided cervical SNRB is a safe, radiation-free technique that enables real-time visualization of nerve roots and vascular structures, thereby enhancing the safety profile compared to fluoroscopy-guided approaches. The detailed step-by-step technique described herein should enable other clinicians to incorporate this approach into practice for accurate preoperative level selection in patients with multilevel cervical disc disease.

Indexed as

cervical disccervical vertebraediscogenic neck paindiskectomyinterventionalnerve blockpreoperative careradiculopathyultrasonographyultrasound-guided hydrodissection

Identifiers

PMID42028518
PMCPMC13102471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.