ArticleCureus2026
Assessment of Knowledge, Awareness, and Perceptions of Cancer Among Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs): A Multistate Qualitative Study From India.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This qualitative study aims to assess the knowledge, awareness, attitudes, beliefs, and perceived barriers related to cancer prevention and screening among Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) workers across three Indian states (Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and Meghalaya). Methods Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with ASHA workers using a semi-structured guide covering awareness of cancer symptoms, screening practices, risk perception, and cultural beliefs. The study included a total of 90 ASHA workers, of whom 50 were from Ludhiana, 25 from Uttar Pradesh, and 15 from Meghalaya. Data were thematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti software (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Themes were coded across categories, including general awareness, screening behavior, personal experience, trusted information sources, and community recommendations. Results ASHAs demonstrated partial but varied knowledge of cancer symptoms, with higher awareness of oral cancer compared to breast and cervical cancers. Key barriers to screening included fear of infection, stigma, lack of facility availability, and sociocultural myths. Despite recognizing the benefits of early detection, most ASHAs had not undergone screening themselves. Personal experience with cancer cases led to greater engagement. ASHAs suggested community-based interventions such as free screening camps, collaboration with religious centers, and enhanced government support. Conclusion While ASHAs have the potential to serve as change agents for cancer control at the grassroots level, their knowledge and practices are constrained by systemic, educational, and cultural barriers. Strengthening their capacity through standardized oncology training, improving primary healthcare infrastructure, and integrating noncommunicable disease (NCD) services into Health and Wellness Centers are key steps toward improving cancer outcomes in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.