Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028500›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Hypertension Treatment Cascade in Rural Delhi: Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control Among Adults.

Swaleha Furqan, Geeta Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Swaleha FurqanCommunity Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Geeta YadavEpidemiology and Public Health, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA majority of patients with hypertension remain undiagnosed, untreated, non-compliant, and poorly controlled at every stage. However, there is a paucity of information on the hypertension treatment cascade, especially among the population in rural areas. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of different stages of the hypertension treatment cascade among the rural adult population of Delhi.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 325 adult participants in a rural area of Delhi, using a pre-tested, pre-coded, semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire. Blood pressure was measured on two separate occasions, one week apart.

resultsThe overall prevalence of hypertension was 116 (35.7% (95% CI: 30.5-40.9)). Male participants had a higher prevalence of hypertension than female participants. Among the 116 participants identified as hypertensive, 71 (61.2%) were aware of their hypertensive status. Of these, 52 individuals (44.8% of all hypertensives) reported being on treatment. Blood pressure control was achieved in 17 individuals (14.6% of all hypertensives). Non-compliance with treatment was common, with financial constraints (10; 19.2%) and fear of side effects (7; 3.4%). Significant factors associated with hypertension included age, time spent sitting/reclining, tobacco use, comorbidity, and waist circumference (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe present study revealed a high burden of hypertension among adults in rural Delhi. Although the rate of awareness was relatively high, the rates of treatment and control were far from desirable. Compliance with medication and lifestyle interventions was also poor. Strengthening community screening and primary care services is necessary for early detection, continuous management, and improved health outcomes.

Indexed as

awarenesscontrolhypertensionprevalencerisk factorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID42028500
PMCPMC13100455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.