ArticleOpen respiratory archives
[Knowledge and attitudes about social determinants of respiratory health in SEPAR members].
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge and perceptions of social determinants of respiratory health (SDRH) were assessed among SEPAR members using an anonymous online survey. 293 professionals responded (4.8% of members). Although 98.6% recognized that SDRH affects clinical outcomes and more than 78% identified affected patients, 74.7% had never received specific training. The most frequently used indicators were: housing conditions (77.1%), educational level (70%), and language barriers (62.5%). Only 3.4% used standardized instruments, and 12.3% had sufficient time during consultations. Obstacles included low institutional priority, lack of protocols, and time constraints. Among the responding members, a high level of awareness regarding the relevance of SDRH was observed. However, the low response rate limits the generalizability of the results to the entire SEPAR membership. There is an urgent need to develop training strategies and specific protocols on SDRH, a demand supported by 74% of respondents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.