Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028409›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2026

Agentic AI as a coordination paradigm in digital health and agri-food systems.

Anand K Gavai, Miranda P M Meuwissen

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anand K GavaiIndustrial Engineering & Business Information Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Miranda P M MeuwissenBusiness Economics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health and agri-food data systems increasingly rely on sophisticated machine learning and data-sharing infrastructures. Yet persistent challenges in scalability, accountability, and public trust indicate that technical capability alone does not resolve systemic failure. This perspective argues that these limitations primarily arise from architectural misalignment with governance rather than from algorithmic insufficiency. Through a comparative examination of federated learning, blockchain-based infrastructures, and FAIR-aligned platforms, recurring coordination bottlenecks are identified across both health and agricultural domains. Building on these observations, this perspective introduces an agentic coordination model in which task-bounded agentic components operate under explicit institutional and regulatory constraints. The model context protocol (MCP) is presented as a reference mechanism for mediating policy, provenance, and accountability across distributed agents without centralizing control. Rather than prescribing a universal solution, this work frames agentic architectures as a governance-aware design space for future digital health and food systems.

Indexed as

agentic artificial intelligencedigital health equitygreenhouseshealth informaticsmetabolic healthpersonalized nutritionsustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID42028409
PMCPMC13100677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.