ReviewJPRAS open2026
A systematic review of the Wide Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet (WALANT) approach in pediatric hand surgery.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Hand Surgery: An Environmental Analysis of the Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Approach for Pediatric Trigger Thumb Release.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) for hand surgery in children and adolescents remains limited due to concerns regarding patient cooperation. This systematic review aims to synthesize the existing evidence on WALANT in the pediatric population to guide future directives. Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. In June 2025, a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was conducted. All studies reporting on WALANT in patients <18 years old were retrieved without date restrictions. For those meeting inclusion criteria, study and patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. In addition, study quality was assessed based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Results: Eleven studies were identified, including 441 patients and 507 procedures. No major complications were documented, and conversion to sedation or general anesthesia was required in only 0.6% of patients. Overall, the procedures were successful, as shown by consistent improvements in hand function. Patient feedback suggested high levels of satisfaction and minimal perioperative pain. Additionally, certain studies observed marked reductions in operative time, room time, recovery time, hospital stay, and costs. Conclusions: Although the literature is limited, our findings demonstrate that WALANT is a safe, feasible and effective alternative to systemic anesthesia in children and adolescents. Key considerations include appropriate patient selection, child-centered communication strategies, distraction techniques, and supportive environments. This supports the broader integration of WALANT into pediatric practice. However, further research is warranted to optimize patient experience and assess institutional benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.