ReviewThe journal of climate change and health
Tailoring climate-health competencies for diverse health cadres: Findings from a scoping review.
Review in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change poses a growing global health threat, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with fragile health systems and limited adaptive capacity. The health workforce plays a critical role in managing climate-sensitive health risks but often lacks adequate training. Building climate-resilient health systems therefore requires equipping health workers with the relevant knowledge, skills, and adaptive capacities. The goal of this review was to synthesize existing literature to inform the creation of a climate-health competency framework appropriate for a diverse health workforce. Methods: A scoping review was conducted to examine climate-health competency frameworks across peer-reviewed and grey literature, institutional reports, and global policy documents. Frameworks were analyzed for geographic origin, scope, workforce role differentiation, and contextual applicability, with particular attention to LMIC relevance. This was followed by framework construction as described below. Results: Most existing frameworks originated from high-income countries (HICs) and presuppose strong institutional capacity, digital infrastructure, and governance systems-conditions not typical in LMICs. Furthermore, they rarely distinguish competencies across different health workforce roles, limiting practical implementation. From the synthesis, a consolidated KSTCP framework was derived, encompassing five domains: Knowledge, Systems Thinking, Technical Skills, Communication and Leadership, and Practice. Two major gaps were identified: (1) limited LMIC-specific frameworks, and (2) insufficient role differentiation. To address these, a cadre-specific competency set was developed for clinical, public health, and community health workers, aligned with their distinct functions in service delivery and community engagement. Conclusion: The proposed framework provides actionable, context-sensitive guidance for educators, policymakers, and development partners to strengthen health workforce capacity for climate resilience. It offers globally relevant competencies that differentiate workforce roles to support effective implementation, with particular significance for LMICs, where capacity constraints make targeted workforce development especially important. Implementing cadre-specific climate-health competencies can enhance preparedness and adaptive responses within climate-vulnerable health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.