ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Myval Octacor and Octapro T
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rescue Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Native Aortic Regurgitation in a Young Patient with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy and Cardiogenic Shock: Review of the Literature and Case Presentation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Myval Beyond the Aortic Valve: Device-Anatomy Interaction, Procedural Strategy, and Clinical Evidence in Mitral, Tricuspid, and Pulmonary Positions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: the treatment of high-risk or inoperable patients with severe, pure native non calcified aortic regurgitation (NCAR) poses unique procedural challenges for the Methods: a retrospective cohort analysis was performed on consecutive high-risk surgical patients with severe, pure NCAR who underwent TAVI between January 2023 and June 2025 with the second (Octacor) and third (Octapro) generation of the Myval BE THV. Main end-points were technical and device success according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) 3 criteria. The rates of permanent pace-maker implantation (PPI) and moderate-to-severe residual AR both, in-hospital and at the longest available follow-up were also evaluated. Results: during the study period, 32 patients (Octacor, n = 21 and Octapro, n = 11) with pure, NCAR were treated. Mean age was 79.3 ± 7.6 years while 81.2% were male. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 43.1 ± 7.4%. An XL size was implanted in 21 patients of whom 15 were 32 mm. The average percentage of THV oversize was 19.7 ± 6.9. Technical success was achieved in 87.5% of the cases due to partial migration of 4 THVs (all 32 mm implanted in large annuli) into the LVOT requiring rescue implantation of a second prosthesis. This strategy was effective in achieving a good result in 2 cases while in the remaining 2, the THVs embolized in the left ventricle requiring surgical conversion. No intraprocedural death or disabling strokes were reported. PPI rate at discharge was 9.4% while moderate residual AR was reported in 1 patient (including patient underwent successful rescue THV-in-THV). Device success was 87.5%. At 1-year follow-up, mortality and PPI rates were 3.1% and 15.6%, respectively with no severe residual AR cases reported. Conclusions: Octacor and Octapro BE THVs implantation in patients with pure NCAR is feasible and yields acceptable clinical outcomes in a high-risk population. Further studies are warranted to better understand the potential role of these THVs in this complex scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.