Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028299›Full record

ArticleBiophotonics discovery2025

Corey Simmerer, Marisa Morakis, Lei Tian, Lia Gomez-Perez, T Y Alvin Liu, Nicholas J Durr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophotonics discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Biophotonics discovery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Corey SimmererJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5160-1332
Marisa MorakisJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-6043
Lei TianBoston University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1316-4456
Lia Gomez-PerezJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
T Y Alvin LiuWilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-0755
Nicholas J DurrJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-7383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Access to diagnostic eye care could be expanded with high-throughput and easy-to-use tools. Phase mask-based imaging may improve the fundus camera by enabling computational refocusing with no moving parts, reducing hardware complexity and cost. Although phase mask-based imaging has been demonstrated in a model eye, this approach has not been shown Aim: A computational fundus camera was designed, constructed, and evaluated with the goal of determining the feasibility and performance of phase mask-based computational imaging of the Approach: A holographic diffuser was introduced in a modified commercial fundus camera at a plane conjugate to the ocular pupil, resulting in a linear and shift-invariant point spread function that varies with refractive error. The image could be digitally refocused across a range of Results: The device captured and digitally refocused color human fundus images. The field of view was Conclusion: We present the first

Indexed as

computational imagingdiffuser cameradigital refocusingfundus imagingphase masks

Identifiers

PMID42028299
PMCPMC13101061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.