ArticleBiophotonics discovery2025
Optimization of a mobile imaging system to aid in evaluating patients with oral lesions in a dental care setting.
Article in Biophotonics discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Oral cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage even though the oral cavity is easily accessible for examination. There is a need for tools to support early detection and help non-expert clinicians make appropriate referral recommendations. Aim: We aim to evaluate a mobile detection of oral cancer (mDOC) smartphone-based autofluorescence imaging system by collecting data in a representative, low-prevalence population and optimizing a referral algorithm suitable for deployment in community dental settings. Approach: Data were collected from patients at a community dental clinic using the mDOC system, which captures white light and autofluorescence images. A multi-input deep learning algorithm was developed using both previously acquired and newly collected data in a rehearsal training method. Performance was evaluated on training, validation, and test sets using expert referral decision as the ground truth. Metrics included the Brier Skill Score, area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Data from 252 anatomic sites across 50 patients were collected, with five sites in four patients referred to an oral cancer specialist based on expert review. The best-performing algorithm achieved a Brier Skill Score of 0.126. It reached an AUC-ROC of 0.986 on the validation set and an AUC-ROC of 0.778 on the test set. Sensitivity and specificity on the test set were 60.0% and 88.0%, respectively. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential of the mDOC system and referral algorithm to assist in early detection and triage of oral mucosal lesions in low-prevalence, community dental clinic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.