Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028290›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Fraction dose escalation of split-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy following induction chemo-immunotherapy in unresectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous carcinoma in China (GASTO-10102): a single-centre phase 1 study.

FangJie Liu, DaQuan Wang, GuangYu Luo, HaoTing Zhang, YiMei Liu, PengXin Zhang, Biao Xia, Yu SiTu, MengRu Wang, DongSheng Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

FangJie LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
DaQuan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
GuangYu LuoDepartment of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
HaoTing ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
YiMei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
PengXin ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Biao XiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yu SiTuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
MengRu WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
DongSheng ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yi HuDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
JunYe WangDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Bo QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal fractionation patterns and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy remain poorly defined in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated fraction dose (MTFD) of split-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) following induction chemo-immunotherapy in patients with LA-ESCC. Methods: In this phase 1 study, patients (aged 18-80 years) with unresectable, histologically confirmed LA-ESCC (stage T1-4, N0-3, M0-1 disease; ECOG 0-1) were enrolled from one site in China (Sun yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong). Eligible participants had no prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, or immunotherapy for ESCC and no evidence of deep ulceration on baseline esophagoscopy. Enrolled participants received two cycles of induction albumin-bound paclitaxel (260 mg/m Findings: Between Aug 31, 2023, and July 23, 2024, 18 patients were enrolled (n = 6 per dose), and all completed split-course CCRT per protocol. The MTFD was not reached, and dose level 3 was tolerable. The most common grade 3 toxicity was lymphopenia (72.2%), followed by esophagitis (11.1%). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities occurred. The objective response rate after induction therapy was 100%. After CCRT, the clinical complete response rate was 83.3%. With a median follow-up of 20.5 months, median progression-free and overall survival were not reached; 1-year rates were 88.9% and 94.4%, respectively. Interpretation: Fraction dose-escalated split-course CCRT following induction chemo-immunotherapy was feasible, well tolerated, and showed encouraging preliminary efficacy. Larger prospective studies are warranted. Funding: The National Key Research and Development Program of China and the Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

Indexed as

Chemo-immunotherapyDose-limiting toxicitiesMaximum tolerated fraction doseOesophageal squamous cell carcinomaSplit-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42028290
PMCPMC13099347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.