ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2026
Clinical decision-making in rare bone diseases - A survey among members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and the European Reference Network on Rare Bone Diseases (ERN BOND).
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical management of rare bone diseases (RBDs) is challenged by low prevalence, delayed diagnosis, and complex multidisciplinary needs. This survey aimed to map current clinical practices in RBDs, identify unmet needs, and generate foundational data to guide the development of minimum standards for patient assessment. Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed to members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and the European Reference Network on Rare Bone Diseases (ERN BOND) in September 2025. Questions addressed diagnostic work-up, interdisciplinary care, transition practices, and future perspectives. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and free-text responses thematically. Results: A total of 119 respondents (35 countries), mostly orthopaedic surgeons (74%), completed the survey. Almost all (118/119) provided direct care, and 63% had >10 years' experience treating RBDs. Over 80% routinely used anthropometric, posture, and alignment measures, whereas the use of advanced tools varied. Interdisciplinary care is widely applied at varying frequencies, with a high consideration for shared decision-making and quality of life. Most lacked registry access (>80%) and formal transition protocols (~70%). Respondents prioritised clinical frameworks over technological advances and anticipated increasing future relevance for technological innovations. Conclusions: This survey highlights considerable variability in clinical decision-making for RBDs. The findings underscore the importance and need of standardised interdisciplinary care, registry data, and structured protocols and frameworks. Study Significance: This is the first systematic survey of clinical practice and decision-making process in RBD care among EPOS and ERN BOND members. The findings may guide future recommendations and standards, supporting more harmonised care for individuals with RBDs, especially ultra-rare conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.