ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
A comparative study of one-step vs. two-step approach in the treatment of pediatric gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of the one-step and two-step methods of ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the clinical application of pediatric gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones. Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from pediatric patients diagnosed with gallbladder stones combined with common bile duct stones at our hospital from January 2023 to January 2026. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the one-step group (underwent ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the same anesthesia) and the two-step group (underwent ERCP first, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a separate session). Baseline data and perioperative indicators were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 76 pediatric patients were included in the study, with 29 patients in the one-step group and 47 patients in the two-step group. There were no significant differences in the preoperative baseline data (gender, age, BMI, common bile duct diameter, and preoperative liver function indicators) between the two groups (all Conclusion: The one-step ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in the treatment of pediatric gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones. The one-step method reduces the number of anesthesia sessions and anesthesia time, lowers the risk of general anesthesia in children, and shortens the length of hospitalization, making it worthy of clinical promotion in pediatrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.