ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2026
Continuous versus intermittent anticoagulation during endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on: Continuous versus intermittent anticoagulation during endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic variceal treatment (EVT) in cirrhotic patients carries a risk of periprocedural bleeding, making anticoagulation management challenging in those with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Objectives: The first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous versus intermittent anticoagulation during EVT in cirrhotic patients with acute PVT. Methods: In this trial, cirrhotic patients with acute PVT and esophageal varices requiring EVT were assigned to either a continuous or intermittent anticoagulation group. In the continuous anticoagulation group, anticoagulation began immediately after PVT diagnosis and continued during EVT. In the intermittent group, anticoagulation was resumed 1 week post-procedurally. Incidences of post-procedural bleeding and hepatic decompensation events were observed during a 1-year follow-up period. Potential confounders were adjusted for using multivariable binary logistic regression. Results: Among 120 enrolled patients, 112 were analyzed (continuous anticoagulation group, Conclusion: Continuous anticoagulation during EVT in cirrhotic patients with acute PVT is safe and does not increase early rebleeding risk. It significantly reduces late and overall bleeding events and may improve long-term outcomes. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800017430.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.