Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

A sham-controlled randomised trial evaluating the safety, acceptability, and efficacy of autonomic neuromodulation using transcutaneous vagal sensory stimulation in uncontrolled hypertensive patients: rationale and study design of the SCRATCH-HTN study.

Ajay Gupta, David Collier, James Steckelmacher, Jane Field, Olivier Zongo, Mital Patel, George Collett, Everard Mascarenhas, Andrey Gourine, Annastazia Learoyd and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05179343 (Sham Controlled RCT Evaluating the Safety, Acceptability and Efficacy of Autonomic Neuromodulation Using Trans-cutaneous Vagal Stimulation in Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05179343 nacompletednot on this map

Sham Controlled RCT Evaluating the Safety, Acceptability and Efficacy of Autonomic Neuromodulation Using Trans-cutaneous Vagal Stimulation in Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2022 to 2025Enrolled63ConditionsUncontrolled Hypertension, High Blood PressureArmsActive AffeX-CT device, Sham AffeX-CT device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hypertension: a missing piece in HFpEF?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ajay GuptaWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
David CollierWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
James SteckelmacherWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Jane FieldWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Olivier ZongoWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Mital PatelWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
George CollettWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Everard MascarenhasAfferent Medical Solutions Ltd., Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Andrey GourineAfferent Medical Solutions Ltd., Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Annastazia LearoydWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander V GourineAfferent Medical Solutions Ltd., Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Peter S SeverNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the broad availability of antihypertensive drugs, approximately 40% of hypertensive patients fail to achieve the recommended blood pressure (BP) levels and may require alternative treatment(s). At present, renal denervation is the only proven non-pharmacological device-based alternative treatment available, but it is a costly, invasive, hospital-based procedure that is unlikely to be widely available. Transcutaneous autonomic neuromodulation (tAN)-if shown to be safe, acceptable, and efficacious-can offer a non-invasive, inexpensive, self-administered device-based innovative adjunct or alternative to pharmacological therapy. Methods: SCRATCH-HTN is a double-blind, sham-controlled trial, with 63 participants randomised on a 2:1 basis to receive either tAN or sham-tAN treatment. Hypertensive patients on medication were included if they had elevated systo-diastolic BPs on daytime ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) [systolic BP (SBP) of ≥135 and <170 mmHg and mean daytime diastolic BP (DBP) of ≥85 and <115 mmHg]. Participants were trained to self-administer tAN therapy for 30 min every day for first 14 days and then once a week for 10 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in daytime ambulatory SBP from baseline to 3 months. Secondary endpoints included change in 24-h ambulatory and office SBP and DBP, BP variability, heart rate variability, quality of life, and sleep quality from baseline to end of treatment. Other exploratory outcomes included evaluation of impact on functional exercise (6-min walk test), structural and functional changes in the heart, cognitive function, and central blood pressures. A subgroup of patients underwent detailed autonomic functional assessment at the start and end of the study. Conclusion: The SCRATCH-HTN trial is a phase 2a study testing the safety, acceptability, and potential efficacy of tAN treatment for improving blood pressure control in patients with elevated BP despite medication. It also explores the effects of tAN on sleep, exercise tolerance, heart rate variability, central BP, cardiac structure, and autonomic function. If effective, it could offer a transformative approach to hypertension management. Study Protocol Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05179343 and ISRCTN (14509154).

Indexed as

autonomicclinical trialhypertensionrandomised control trial (RCT)sham-controlledtranscutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (TVNS)vagal nerve stimulation (VNS)

Identifiers

PMID42028232
PMCPMC13099862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.