ArticleNature and science of sleep2026
Factors Affecting Sleep Quality in Pregnant Women During the Second Trimester and Its Association with Birth Outcomes.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the sleep quality of pregnant women in mid-pregnancy in Wuhan study and analyze its association with birth outcomes in a cross-sectional study. Patients and Methods: The sleep quality of 2210 pregnant women in the second trimester from Wuhan were evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Dietary quality and prenatal depression were assessed by the dietary variety score (DVS) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), respectively. Birth outcomes were retrieved from the Maternal and Child Health Information System. Principal component analysis, stratified analysis, and binary Logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results: Among the 2210 pregnant women, the prevalence of sleep disturbance during the second trimester was 18.14%. After adjusting for confounding factors, a EPDS score ≥ 11, pre-pregnancy alcohol consumption, and moderate to severe vomiting during pregnancy were risk factors for sleep disturbance; while a DVS score ≥ 28 points and exercise during pregnancy were protective factors for sleep disturbance. Sleep disturbance were significantly associated with a reduced risk of large for gestational age (LGA) (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.94, P = 0.023), macrosomia (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.86, P = 0.023), and a marginal association with an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB) (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.97-2.35, P = 0.065), but stratified interaction analysis showed that sleep disturbance increased the risk of PTB, low birth weight, small for gestational age and small vulnerable neonates in mothers with pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 24 kg/m Conclusion: Clinically, it is crucial to enhance sleep quality screening during the second trimester and provide targeted interventions for high-risk groups to improve maternal and infant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.