ArticleAJOG global reports2026
Adverse perinatal outcomes indicative of RhD-mediated hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in Eastern Ethiopia: evidence of maternal health inequity in a multicenter cohort study.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) has become rare in high-income countries, it remains a significant cause of perinatal death in low-and middle-income countries. Nonetheless, true epidemiological data in Africa are lacking.
objectiveTo obtain insight into the prevalence of anti-Rhesus D-mediated HDFN in Ethiopia, pregnancy outcomes were compared between RhD-negative and RhD-positive women. STUDY
designA multicenter facility-based retrospective cohort study was performed on 6796 women who gave birth (≥28 weeks of gestation) in 13 Ethiopian Obstetric Surveillance System hospitals from January to March 2024. Data were retrospectively collected from maternal and neonatal medical records from antenatal care to birth and neonatal registry. The composite adverse perinatal outcomes (APO) included stillbirth, neonatal loss, or Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission. The likelihood of HDFN was based on clinical review by 3 experts blinded to the maternal blood group.
resultsIn 6141 of 6796 women with known RhD status, 327 (5.3%) were RhD-negative. APO was seen in 13.3% women, and occurred twice as often in RhD-negative, as compared to RhD-positive women (aOR=2.3; 95% CI: 1.7-2.9). Clinical signs were highly suggestive of HDFN in 5.8% of RhD-negative women, as compared to 0.2% in RhD-positive women (
conclusionOur study identifies that RhD-negative women experience a two-fold increased odds of APO, most likely due to HDFN. This highlights the need for strategies to address these maternal and child health inequities, including using anti-RhD immunoprophylaxis to prevent HDFN and screening for blood group antibodies to identify pregnancies at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.