ArticleElectroanalysis2025
Machine Learning Applied to Electrochemical Data Processing for Improved Analyte Quantification in Complex Saliva.
Article in Electroanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Electrochemical Sensing: A Network Evidence Map of Translational Barriers and Pathways to Point-of-Care Deployment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Recent Progress in Artificial Intelligence in Biosensor Development: From Bioprobe Design to Fabrication and Signal Analysis.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biofluids that can be noninvasively and frequently collected, such as saliva, have great promise for real-time analyte monitoring at the point of care to inform on patient health. However, analyte quantification in these fluids can be challenging due to their complex composition that can reduce signal-to-noise ratio. In the context of electrochemical sensing in saliva, the complexity of saliva can result in signal interference through a high and variable background such that accurate and reproducible analyte quantification is challenging. Simple analysis algorithms that focus on a single peak feature may work well for analyte quantification in well-defined buffer backgrounds but may not be ideal for analyte quantification in complex biofluids. Motivated by this, for the task of quantifying drug levels in saliva from electrochemical voltammogram measurements, we assessed the performance of five different types of regression models: k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process (GP), and linear multivariate. We trained and tested the models on hundreds of voltammograms spanning five different analyte concentrations of the anti-seizure drug carbamazepine spiked into whole human saliva. For each regression model type, we performed feature selection from nine voltammogram features coupled with hyperparameter tuning, using a performance metric that combined coefficient of determination (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.