ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Flagging Septum: New Concept to Describe Septal Support Loss and Its Impact on the Nasal Cycle.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nasal cycle is a physiological phenomenon characterized by alternating congestion and decongestion of the turbinates and the nasal septum, which modulates airflow resistance, promotes humidification, and conditions inspired air. During the congestive phase, contact between the inferior turbinate and the septum may occur, which has been considered part of normal physiology. However, septal surgery involving excessive cartilage resection can alter this relationship, generating a flaccid and unstable septum incapable of serving as an opposing surface. This condition leads to paradoxical symptoms of obstruction, turbulence, and dryness, resembling empty nose syndrome. Clinical observations have repeatedly identified this finding, although it still lacks a clear designation. We propose the term "flagging septum" to graphically describe the loss of central support, in which the septum behaves like a flag fluttering without resistance upon turbinate contact. The literature supports the relevance of septum-turbinate interaction: Keuning described intermittent contact during the cycle; Shaikh demonstrated the clinical association between intermittent septum-turbinate contact and headache; and computational fluid dynamics studies confirmed that the loss of septal opposition alters mucosal stimulation and airflow perception. Furthermore, the role of the nasal septal swell body has been reported as an additional regulator, which loses effectiveness in the absence of rigid septal support. Flagging septum exists and is clinically identifiable; what remains is to quantify its magnitude using objective tools. Adoption of this term may enrich clinical practice and surgical teaching while raising awareness of a preventable complication associated with excessive septal resection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.