Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028103›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Nasal Ala Reconstruction Using a 2-stage Nasolabial Flap: Retrospective Analysis of a Refined Technique.

Tina Deutinger, Carina Harasser, Evi M Morandi, Marko Konschake, Marit Zwierzina, Petra Pülzl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tina DeutingerFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Carina HarasserFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Evi M MorandiFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marko KonschakeInstitute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marit ZwierzinaFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Petra PülzlFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reconstruction of the nasal alar subunit remains a challenging task in reconstructive surgery. Due to the anatomical complexity of this region, the demands for an ideal flap are manifold. Although the nasal ala is structured to allow facial expressions and breathing, it also contributes to the aesthetic aspects of the nose. Methods: We developed a refined 2-stage nasolabial flap procedure using a turnover flap for the inner lining. Although enhancing aesthetic and functional outcomes, the procedure aims to minimize bulkiness and improve contour definition. Results: The 2-stage nasolabial flap was performed on 6 patients between 2018 and 2024. No major complications occurred, and no partial or complete flap loss was observed. No significant nostril asymmetry or nasal obstruction was reported. Aesthetic outcomes were rated as satisfactory by all patients. Scars were minimal, and flap swelling decreased within 3 months. Conclusions: Compared with other reconstructive options, the nasolabial flap offers a safe, fast, cosmetically pleasing, and simple procedure for the reconstruction of the nasal alar subunit.

Identifiers

PMID42028103
PMCPMC13102423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.