ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026
Invited Perspective: It is Time to Rename SCFE.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While plain radiographs confirm the clinical diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), advanced imaging offers a deeper understanding of the underlying pathoanatomy-specifically, the role of acquired retroversion in causing gait disturbance, knee pain, and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). In this manuscript, we synthesize past and recent insights into the pathomechanics of SCFE. Greater recognition of femoral rotation could be achieved by changing the misnomer SCFE to proximal femoral acquired retroversion (PFAR). We hypothesize that rebranding the condition may help enhance understanding among patients and trainees and potentially improve measurement and treatment strategies through imaging and novel surgical approaches that focus on correcting femoral version. Key Concepts: (1)The history of diagnosing and treating SCFE relied heavily on two-dimensional imaging and therefore underestimates the role of axial rotation in this condition and its sequelae.(2)The term "SCFE" has contributed to ongoing misunderstandings of this diagnosis and may therefore discourage management approaches that focus on correcting retroversion.(3)Revisiting the name of this condition can help improve understanding of its three-dimensional aspects and effects (such as gait disturbance, knee pain, femoroacetabular impingement) among patients, families, and trainees.(4)A new name-proximal femoral acquired retroversion (PFAR)-would align with current fracture terminology conventions, as it describes the displacement of the distal fragment relative to the proximal fragment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.