ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Spreading depolarization in neurocritical care: a review of SD'S pathophysiological continuum and clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients in neurocritical care are often vulnerable to secondary brain injury, wherein spreading depolarization (SD) is identified as a pivotal electrophysiological catalyst. This study consolidates current advancements in SD research, focusing on its clinical translation into neurointensive care. A primary emphasis is the revised and accurate terminology, differentiating the depolarization event (SD) from the concomitant electrophysiological suppression termed cortical spreading depression (CSD), a distinction crucial for interpreting both fundamental and clinical data. Notable advancements in non-invasive detection, especially using full-band scalp electroencephalography (EEG) enhanced by machine learning, currently attain sensitivities of over 85%, with the potential to broaden SD monitoring outside specialized facilities. The integration of SD data with multimodal parameters-such as cerebral microdialysis (which reveals distinctive glutamate surges and metabolic crises) and tissue oxygenation-provides a more comprehension understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. The review highlights dose-dependent treatment strategies, indicating that preliminary clinical studies suggest ketamine's effectiveness in suppressing SD may rely on maintenance dosages beyond approximately 1.15 mg/kg/h. These converging research fronts establish SD not merely as an epiphenomenon but as a dynamic, actionable biomarker for real-time precision management in brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.