ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
"Exploring vulnerabilities: A mixed-method Transdisciplinary Study of Dengue and Diarrhea in Peru".
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study explores the multifactorial vulnerabilities to dengue and diarrhea in Peru, particularly within the municipality of Caballococha, in the Loreto department (region). It elucidates the complex interactions between climate change, socio-economic inequalities, and public health, while emphasizing the importance of combining collaborative knowledge strategies with both macro-level data analysis and micro-level experiential insights. Methods: We employed a transdisciplinary-inspired methodology, integrating mixed method approaches with active participant engagement across multiple research stages. Utilizing literature and publicly available datasets, we developed a statistical model, the National Vulnerability Index (NVI), to identify risk factors for dengue and diarrhea at the national level. Through the Dialogue of Knowledge (DoK) methodology-a participatory framework that melds local and scientific knowledge-we explored perspectives and the lived experiences related to dengue and diarrhea in one single municipality, Caballococha. This approach facilitated a deeper understanding of vulnerability processes and enabled joint planning of mitigation strategies with the community. Results: The NVI indicated that dengue and diarrhea exhibit contrasting spatial patterns of vulnerablity, with the jungle more vulnerable for diarrhea than for dengue. This pattern may be more associated with gender-based vulnerabilities and self identification from an Amazonic population, rather than by water access and sanitation. Infrastructure: The DoK sessions identified critical local factors contributing to increased disease incidence, including inadequate water and sanitation infrastructure, unplanned urbanization, occupational exposure, and geographic isolation. These factors not only corroborate themes discussed in the literature but also reveal some gaps. Additionally, we co-created mitigation strategies that centered on strengthening municipal infrastructure, expanding preventive education, and fostering cross-sector collaboration. Conclusions: This study underscores the critical importance of integrating scientific data with local knowledge to devise effective public health interventions. Despite challenges such as data granularity and model fit, our findings provide actionable insights for context-specific strategies, especially in under-resourced, climate-sensitive areas. Our research emphasizes the value of transdisciplinary frameworks in addressing the complex challenges posed by climate-sensitive diseases and highlights the role of borderland regions like Caballococha as crucial epistemic sites for boosting public health resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.