ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Lessons from a multi-country research project on climate and health policy integration.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change and public health present interlinked challenges that could be more effectively addressed through stronger integration of climate and health policies. In this case report, we reflect on the process of developing and implementing a complex, multinational climate and health research project on a compressed timeframe. This research examined challenges and possibilities for climate-health policy and involved in-depth interviews with high-level policy stakeholders. Methodology: Drawing on interviews with our research partners conducted after the project's conclusion, we describe some of the benefits and challenges of using a centralized "hub and spoke" co-production model to manage international research collaborations. Findings: While this approach enabled us to balance expediency with collaborative decision-making, it can raise tensions between standardization and adaptability of research methodologies. We also describe external challenges such as accelerated timelines and administrative hurdles and provide insights into our approaches to dealing with these challenges. Conclusion: We conclude by offering project management lessons for other international research collaborations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.