Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027887›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

A group-housing system for an artificial shark uterus.

Taketeru Tomita, Atsushi Kaneko, Tomoya Takeda, Keiichi Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taketeru TomitaOkinawa Churashima Research Institute, Okinawa Churashima Foundation, Motobu, Japan.
Atsushi KanekoOkinawa Churaumi Aquarium, Okinawa Churashima Foundation, Motobu, Japan.
Tomoya TakedaOkinawa Churaumi Aquarium, Okinawa Churashima Foundation, Motobu, Japan.
Keiichi SatoOkinawa Churashima Research Institute, Okinawa Churashima Foundation, Motobu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed an artificial shark uterus system that enables the simultaneous maintenance of multiple embryos within a single container. In previous designs, group housing of late-stage embryos was unsuccessful because the activation of one embryo stimulated others, triggering collective hyperactivity. This led to severe skin abrasions due to repeated contact with the rubber mesh covering the container opening. The key modifications and functional principle of the new system are as follows:•The rubber mesh was eliminated and replaced with an acrylic cylinder that provides vertical space above the incubation container.•This vertical space allows activated embryos to swim upward, reducing physical contact between active and inactive individuals.This method increases incubation density and broadens the applicability of artificial uterine technology to shark species with high fecundity.

Indexed as

Artificial uterine fluidArtificial wombConservation breedingElasmobranchsEmbryoIncubation

Identifiers

PMID42027887
PMCPMC13100245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.