ArticleMethodsX2026
Simple, rapid and cost-effective DNA extraction techniques for detection of economically important fruit flies in India.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) include nearly 200 economically important species, many of which are quarantine pests. Accurate identification is vital for pest management, but morphological diagnosis is often difficult for non-specialists due to similarities in diagnostic traits. DNA barcoding has become the gold standard, providing precise species identification using molecular markers. However, conventional DNA extraction methods, though reliable, are time-consuming and require advanced laboratory facilities, while commercial kits are costly and unsuitable for large-scale use and resource-limited settings. To address this, we established four new rapid and inexpensive DNA extraction methods using Tween 20 + NaOH solution (RDI) buffer, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer and Chelex + Proteinase K solution (Chelex buffer). These methods consistently yielded DNA of sufficient quality and concentration across five major tephritid pests:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.