Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027884›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2026

Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Techniques in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Deepak Ranoji Naik, Dr Amit Savyanavar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepak Ranoji NaikDepartment of Computer Engineering and Technology, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Dr Amit SavyanavarDepartment of Computer Engineering and Technology, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is a slow, progressive neurological disorder that impacts the brain tissue and causes cells to die, the most common reason for dementia. It typically reduces brain volume, subsequently impairing several cognitive functions. We explored the phases of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis by thoroughly analysing the paper and highlighting the significance of pre-processing methods. Artificial intelligence progress has transformed medical image analysis by enabling automatic, precise identification of Alzheimer's disease through hybrid architectures, convolutional neural networks, and transfer-learning-based models. This article includes applications of Alzheimer's disease based on datasets, Artificial Intelligence models, limitations, pre-processing methods, challenges, and current research in this area. The article lists various medicinal modalities, risk factors for Alzheimer's disease, the disease's progression stages, and different criteria for evaluating the performance of Artificial Intelligence models. Accuracy, precision, confusion matrix, AUC, F1-score, ROC, recall, and MCC are some of the metrics covered in this paper. The paper discusses the number of comparisons of various deep learning techniques for Alzheimer's, new trends, limitations, recommendations, and future directions. Finally, the paper shows the ongoing practical outcomes and difficulties in Alzheimer's situations. Building on the analysis, this survey helps to cover different dimensions of Alzheimer's disease that have not been previously considered.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkersDeep learningMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID42027884
PMCPMC13101296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.