ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Exploring work motivation in High and Intensive Care wards with the confession booth: An innovative approach.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the Netherlands, the High and Intensive Care model has been developed to enhance the quality of care and reduce coercion on acute psychiatric wards, with staff recognized as a crucial factor in its successful implementation. However, high staff turnover threatens both sustainable implementation of the model and the well-being of patients and healthcare professionals. Objectives: To inform strategies for staff retention and recruitment, this study explores the motivations of professionals working on High and Intensive Care wards. Methods: We used an innovative arts-based method known as the 'confession booth' to collect data that uncovers deep motivations and encourages individuals to reflect anonymously. The confession booth, a designated room on the ward, invited staff to send voice messages via WhatsApp, in response to three prompts: 1) What impressed them most during their shift 2) What made them most proud, and 3) What frustrated them most. Settings: The confession booth operated simultaneously across eight High and Intensive Care wards in the Netherlands over the course of two weeks. Results: Thematic analysis identified four overarching themes, each comprising multiple subthemes: meaningful engagement, professional agency, collaborative competence, and security. Participants emphasized that High and Intensive Care work is driven by a deep sense of compassion and a strong commitment to supporting patient recovery. The complexity of the work, along with active involvement in clinical decision-making, was described as both meaningful and professionally rewarding. Effective teamwork, particularly within a flexible, skilled, familiar team, was seen as essential to both job satisfaction and safety. Feeling safe emerged as a crucial prerequisite for all aspects of the work in which effective collaboration and adequate support from law enforcement were essential to maintaining this safety. Conclusion: To safeguard care quality, the persistent vicious cycle of insufficient attention to staff retention must be broken through structural investment in well-being, recognition, and reward. Retention is shaped by meaningful work, opportunities to apply expertise, effective teamwork, and safe working conditions. The confession booth provided a flexible and anonymous space for reflection, offering valuable, though not unlimited, insights. These findings present a strong foundation for improving retention and recruitment within High and Intensive Care settings. Registration number: The Amsterdam Public Health Research institute embedded this study with reference number SQC20222-047 on August 2, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.