ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic detection and classification model for femoral neck fractures using hip imaging: a retrospective multicenter diagnostic study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional Garden classification of femoral-neck fractures relies on radiography or CT, but image quality variations, indistinct fracture lines, and inter-observer differences often cause misclassification-especially for Garden I/II fractures-while fully automated classification remains unexplored. This retrospective multicenter study (2018-2024) included 10,010 hip images from 806 patients across four Chinese hospitals: 7,818 images (529 patients) for model training/internal validation (five-fold cross-validation) and 2,192 images (277 patients) for external robustness testing, with comparisons against 12 physicians of varying experience. Performance was assessed via sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, and other metrics, alongside heat-map interpretability. Five-fold cross-validation yielded 93.34% mean accuracy and 95.29% specificity, with 95.78% mean AUC on the independent test set; the model markedly improved resident physicians' diagnostic accuracy, narrowing gaps with senior clinicians. This deep-learning model enables accurate automatic femoral-neck fracture localization and Garden classification, showing promise for clinical decision support, while prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm its utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.