ReviewEuropean heart journal open2026
Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women.
Review in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Menopause hormone replacement therapy (HRT) remains the main strategy for managing menopausal symptoms and preventing osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. However, its cardiovascular effects are complex and influenced by multiple factors. Early initiation of HRT within 10 years of menopause onset consistently demonstrates cardiovascular benefits, whereas delayed initiation may increase risks such as stroke and venous thromboembolism. Transdermal and bioidentical hormones generally show a safer cardiovascular profile compared to oral synthetic preparations. Current guidelines advocate for individualized therapy considering patient preferences and risk stratification. However, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding long-term safety, diverse populations, and optimized risk assessment tools. The development of a menopause-specific cardiovascular risk calculator could enhance patient-centred care and guide shared decision-making. This review synthesizes current evidence from major randomized trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses, highlighting the critical role of timing, hormone formulation, administration route, and baseline cardiovascular risk in determining HRT's cardiovascular outcomes. It also underscores the importance of precision medicine in optimizing cardiovascular and overall health outcomes for postmenopausal women using HRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.