ArticleACS omega2026
Influence of Pressure and Coal-Forming Environment on the Pyrolysis of Tar-Rich Block Coal from the Santanghu Basin in Xinjiang.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyrolysis is a potential way to realize clean and efficient utilization of tar-rich coal. Pyrolytic efficiency is controlled by both the intrinsic properties of coal and the external pyrolysis conditions. The intrinsic properties of coal are primarily determined by its formation environment. This study revealed the pyrolysis mechanism under varied coal-forming environments (intrinsic factor) and pyrolysis conditions (external factor). The BS coal formed in a deep-water reducing environment has excellent tar yield potential due to its high vitrinite content. The ST coal from a shallow-water reducing environment is more inclined to generate gas and semicoke. The study further reveals that the pressure mainly promoted the secondary reaction by prolonging the retention time of volatiles, thereby inhibiting the tar yield. This mechanism is resulted in decreased tar yields from 9.53% to 8.81% and from 4.91% to 1.91% for the two coal groups. Combining the characteristic of low viscosity at 300 °C for tar with the patterns of porosity and permeability changes in pyrolyzed coal samples under varying temperatures. Basing on these findings, this paper proposes a collaborative optimization strategy: optimizing vitrinite-rich coal sources and utilizing medium-temperature (300-400 °C) process conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.