Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027765›Full record

ArticleBiophotonics discovery2025

Improved performance and design of a low-cost laparoscope to enable laparoscopic surgery in low-income countries.

Anne Christine Barnes, Michele L Kaluzienski, Jason Chen, Tri T Quang, Talya Simcox, Paula Kworekwa, Rebecca Kaaya, Robert Ssekitoleko, Kevin Aroom, John Rzasa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophotonics discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anne Christine BarnesUniversity of Maryland, Department of Bioengineering, College Park, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5181-1922
Michele L KaluzienskiUniversity of Maryland, Department of Bioengineering, College Park, Maryland, United States.
Jason ChenUniversity of Maryland, Department of Bioengineering, College Park, Maryland, United States.
Tri T QuangUniversity of Maryland, Department of Bioengineering, College Park, Maryland, United States.
Talya SimcoxUniversity of Maryland, Department of Bioengineering, College Park, Maryland, United States.
Paula KworekwaMakerere University, Biomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3102-6492
Rebecca KaayaMakerere University, Biomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Uganda.
Robert SsekitolekoMakerere University, Biomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-1812
Kevin AroomUniversity of Maryland, Robert E. Fischell Institute for Biomedical Devices, College Park, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-0585
John RzasaUniversity of Maryland, Robert E. Fischell Institute for Biomedical Devices, College Park, Maryland, United States.
Tamara FitzgeraldDuke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Jenna L MuellerUniversity of Maryland, Department of Bioengineering, College Park, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-8491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Laparoscopy has become the standard of care for surgery in the chest and abdomen but is typically unavailable in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This inaccessibility is partly due to a high initial equipment purchase price, ongoing maintenance costs, unreliable electricity, shortage of biomedical technicians, and limited sterilization facilities. Aim: To address these challenges, a low-cost, durable, reusable laparoscopic system (KeyScope) was designed for use in LMICs. Approach: Through an iterative human-centered design approach, the performance of the KeyScope was optimized by comparing standard image quality metrics to a commercially available standard-of-care (SOC) laparoscope. Results: The latest version of the KeyScope has comparable or better resolving power, lens distortion, field of view, depth of field, and color reproduction accuracy to a SOC laparoscope (Precision Ideal Eyes HD Laparoscope, Stryker) at working distances commonly used during laparoscopic surgery (3 to 13 cm). Interference from electrocautery was eliminated by shielding the camera ground from the housing ground. Finally, the entire KeyScope is equipped for production and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa, as the device can be submerged in Cidex and can be easily assembled in Uganda in under 1 h. Conclusion: These results suggest that the KeyScope has achieved the performance criteria needed for surgical care in LMICs.

Indexed as

biomedical opticsfrugal medical deviceglobal engineeringglobal surgerylaparoscopic surgerylow- and middle-income countries

Identifiers

PMID42027765
PMCPMC13098739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.