ArticleBiophotonics discovery2025
Improved performance and design of a low-cost laparoscope to enable laparoscopic surgery in low-income countries.
Article in Biophotonics discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and feasibility of a low-cost laparoscope in a porcine model.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- First Decade of the National Cancer Institute's Affordable Cancer Technologies Program: Accelerating Translational Technology Research and Development for Cancer Globally.JCO global oncology · 2025Review
- Development of a portable testing chamber to assess imaging performance of laparoscopes in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Laparoscopy has become the standard of care for surgery in the chest and abdomen but is typically unavailable in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This inaccessibility is partly due to a high initial equipment purchase price, ongoing maintenance costs, unreliable electricity, shortage of biomedical technicians, and limited sterilization facilities. Aim: To address these challenges, a low-cost, durable, reusable laparoscopic system (KeyScope) was designed for use in LMICs. Approach: Through an iterative human-centered design approach, the performance of the KeyScope was optimized by comparing standard image quality metrics to a commercially available standard-of-care (SOC) laparoscope. Results: The latest version of the KeyScope has comparable or better resolving power, lens distortion, field of view, depth of field, and color reproduction accuracy to a SOC laparoscope (Precision Ideal Eyes HD Laparoscope, Stryker) at working distances commonly used during laparoscopic surgery (3 to 13 cm). Interference from electrocautery was eliminated by shielding the camera ground from the housing ground. Finally, the entire KeyScope is equipped for production and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa, as the device can be submerged in Cidex and can be easily assembled in Uganda in under 1 h. Conclusion: These results suggest that the KeyScope has achieved the performance criteria needed for surgical care in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.