ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Affective face biases in visual and prefrontal cortex measured with visual entrainment.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facial expressions are ubiquitous and reliable social cues. Research has shown that affective faces attract attention at the cost of competing visual information, with functional neuroimaging evidence suggesting that the prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in regulating responses to emotional distractors. However, methodological constraints within neuroimaging environments often prevent the measurement of unique neural signals from multiple competing stimuli, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn regarding how affective biases in attention are generated in the brain. In the current study, we used a novel frequency tagging approach with visual entrainment during magnetoencephalography to track the unique neural signals elicited by a task-relevant Gabor patch and a concurrent, spatially overlapping face with either an angry, neutral, or happy expression. The entrainment responses were projected to the cortex using a beamformer, and a competition index was calculated per voxel to determine the bias toward either of the spatially overlapping entrained stimuli. In the prefrontal cortex, we found a stronger Gabor bias for neutral compared to angry and happy expressions, supporting prior functional neuroimaging works which point to the prefrontal cortex as critical to the regulation of emotional distractors. In the calcarine, we found a stronger face bias for angry compared to neutral and happy expressions, replicating prior findings from electroencephalography. The separate entrainment responses were also sensitive to facial expression in several regions commonly implicated in face processing, social cognition, and attention. These data highlight the utility of frequency tagging paradigms for tracking unique neural responses to concurrent and spatially overlapping stimuli, which is critical for the study of social and emotional processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.