Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027715›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Understanding the provider experience with digital tools in blended care therapy delivered via telehealth: A mixed-methods evaluation.

Emily G Lattie, Laura D'Adamo, Miranda L Beltzer, Alethea Varra, Connie Chen, Anita Lungu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily G LattieLyra Health, Burlingame, CA, USA.
Laura D'AdamoLyra Health, Burlingame, CA, USA.
Miranda L BeltzerLyra Health, Burlingame, CA, USA.
Alethea VarraLyra Health, Burlingame, CA, USA.
Connie ChenLyra Health, Burlingame, CA, USA.
Anita LunguLyra Health, Burlingame, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In blended care therapy, clients and therapists work together in synchronous psychotherapy sessions and asynchronous guided practice sessions, in which therapists assign digital tools (e.g., video lessons, written exercises) and provide guidance. This model of care is effective at scale, but the therapist experience of delivering this care has not been thoroughly examined. This study explores the therapist experience of using digital tools in blended care therapy delivered via telehealth and the perceived benefits and challenges of working within this model. Methods: Therapists ( Results: The majority of survey participants reported that digital tools had positive effects on their mental health care delivery. Nearly all respondents (93.68%) reported learning new clinical skills from the tools. Three primary themes were generated through thematic analysis. First, we summarize ways in which blended care impacts therapeutic relationships. Then, we describe how the structure of digital tools supports clients and therapists to develop and practice skills. Finally, we discuss how delivering blended care impacts therapist time and energy. Conclusion: Results provide insights into the experience of delivering blended care therapy. Well-integrated digital tools appear to bring unique value to therapists that goes beyond their past experiences delivering care in traditional systems.

Indexed as

blended care therapydigital mental healthmental health caretelehealththerapist experience

Identifiers

PMID42027715
PMCPMC13100370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.