ArticleDigital health
Enhancing mental health care through human-computer interaction: AI holistic design of a mental health APP in China.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The integration of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and healthcare technologies is transforming the landscape of mental health interventions. Despite the growing adoption of mental health apps, current evaluation methods often neglect the interplay between interface design, personalization, emotional resonance, privacy, and community engagement. These gaps limit the capacity of digital tools to meet therapeutic goals while maintaining user trust and long-term engagement. This study examined the role of Xin Dao Diary, an AI-assisted platform, in enhancing emotional well-being through innovative design and user engagement strategies. Methods: With a mixed-methods approach, including walkthrough methods, diary studies, and sentiment analysis of user feedback, we explored how digital interfaces can facilitate effective mental health care. Results: Our findings reveal that intuitive interface design and personalized AI interventions improve user satisfaction and emotional health outcomes. However, challenges remain in data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and the authenticity of emotional responses, which may undermine user trust and limit long-term engagement. Conclusion: The present research proposes a Holistic AI Care Design which emphasized the integration of multiple factors, including user needs, AI personalization, privacy, and community building in app design. It also incorporates usability, user engagement, and ethical considerations into the evaluation of AI-assisted mental health apps. This research underscores the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in advancing digital health solutions, offering valuable insights for developers and healthcare practitioners aiming to optimize user experience and therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.