ArticleDigital health
Generative pretrained transformer (GPT) algorithm can be taught to improve the task of differential diagnosis according to simple principles of clinical reasoning. The case of GPT-4o and a lesson to apply in medical education.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine expands, applications of GPT (generative pretrained transformer) assimilate into the world of medical education. Our objective was to rigorously evaluate the capacity of the GPT algorithm to enhance its methodology for generating differential diagnoses. We hypothesize that the success of GPT would contribute significantly to the advancement of pedagogical strategies in medical education. Methods: ChatGPT-4o was provided with three common clinical scenarios and was asked to give three lists of four differential diagnoses. Through iterative feedback and targeted instruction, we systematically documented the GPT responses as they demonstrated progressive improvements in the accuracy of differential diagnoses. The study includes four discussions, each succeeded by feedback and assessment of ChatGPT's responses. The study took place in the education authority of the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israels' largest hospital, during a 1-month period. Results: For all four clinical scenarios, GPT performance was significantly improved right after the initial human feedback, with higher notable advancement and implementation of feedback in the third and fourth discussions. GPT effectively assimilated the technical recommendations, resulting in differential diagnoses that achieved complete concordance with the intended diagnoses (100% accuracy). Conclusion: GPT-4o demonstrates a robust capacity for learning and operating appropriate methodologies within the clinical reasoning process essential for accurate differential diagnosis. Our findings will guide future directives that will be taught to human medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.