Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027704›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2026

Ontogenetic thermal and metabolic patterns guide physiologically informed, size-based fishery management.

Lauren Stewart, Emily Ball, Clive Trueman, Jamie Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren StewartBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK.
Emily BallOcean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO143ZH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5167-9672
Clive TruemanOcean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO143ZH, UK.
Jamie StevensBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-6721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wrasse species are widely used as cleaner fish in salmon aquaculture but their performance as cleaner fish may be impacted by thermal and ontogenetic changes. Understanding the conditions in which each species of wrasse is most productive as cleaner fish is hugely valuable to make informed decisions on the management of fisheries. To do this, we use a novel geochemical proxy to reconstruct ontogenetic trends in thermal habitat and field metabolic rate for six species of wrasse from two sampling locations from the Isle of Skye (Scotland) and Dorset (southern England). We describe consistent ontogenetic transitions from warmer to cooler thermal habitats across all species, and demonstrate reductions in activity levels associated with ontogenetic habitat shifts after accounting for body size and temperature effects. Field metabolic rates were not significantly different between Dorset and Skye after accounting for body size and temperature. Ontogenetic shifts in thermal habitat and activity level have implications for the effectiveness of wrasse as cleanerfish, as well as providing evidence to support size-based harvesting rules. More broadly, this work highlights the potential of otolith isotope analyses to recover field-based, context-specific data on physiology and thermal ecology, advancing fisheries conservation and management strategies.

Indexed as

Metabolic rateontogenyotolithsalmon aquaculturestable isotopeswrasse

Identifiers

PMID42027704
PMCPMC13102501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.