ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026
Polysaccharides self-healing hydrogel for skin regeneration.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coptis chinensis -derived nanovesicle-loaded biodegradable hydrogel for preventing post-laminectomy epidural fibrosis.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Cutting-Edge Smart Hydrogel Platforms for Improved Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Damaged skin is prone to infection and impaired healing, making efficient wound care materials critical. Polysaccharide-based self-healing hydrogels have demonstrated significant potential in skin regeneration due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM). This review summarizes the fabrication techniques, core polysaccharide materials, and challenges of these hydrogels. Hydrogel preparation primarily involves chemical cross-linking, physical cross-linking, and three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Chemical cross-linking confers high mechanical strength but limited self-healing capacity, while physical cross-linking enables rapid self-healing via dynamic non-covalent interactions, responsive to stimuli like pH and temperature. 3D bioprinting allows customizable tissue-like structures with precise control over cell distribution and bioactive molecule release. Key polysaccharides include alginate, chitosan, hyaluronic acid (HA), cellulose, and dextran. Alginate forms reversible networks via calcium ion cross-linking, suitable for wound dressings and tissue engineering. Chitosan, with amino and hydroxyl groups, exhibits antibacterial activity and promotes cell proliferation, widely used in infected wounds. HA achieves self-healing through dynamic covalent bonds, accelerating collagen deposition and angiogenesis. Cellulose derivatives employ boronic ester or Schiff base linkages for self-healing systems in injectable formulations. Dextran utilizes Diels-Alder reactions for self-healing under physiological conditions, ideal for drug delivery. Commercial products like HyStem® and Chitogel® have entered clinical use, integrating growth factors or antimicrobials to enhance wound healing. However, challenges persist, including insufficient mechanical strength, mismatched degradation rates with healing processes, long-term safety concerns, and scalability. Future directions focus on "smart" hydrogels, combined with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene editing or artificial intelligence (AI)-optimized design, to enhance functionality and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.