Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027670›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026

Polysaccharides self-healing hydrogel for skin regeneration.

Nan Xu, Fanhe Meng, Binglun Zhang, Xing Yang, Haibo Wang, Fan Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nan XuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Fanhe MengDepartment of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
Binglun ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
Xing YangDepartment of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Haibo WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Dermatology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damaged skin is prone to infection and impaired healing, making efficient wound care materials critical. Polysaccharide-based self-healing hydrogels have demonstrated significant potential in skin regeneration due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM). This review summarizes the fabrication techniques, core polysaccharide materials, and challenges of these hydrogels. Hydrogel preparation primarily involves chemical cross-linking, physical cross-linking, and three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Chemical cross-linking confers high mechanical strength but limited self-healing capacity, while physical cross-linking enables rapid self-healing via dynamic non-covalent interactions, responsive to stimuli like pH and temperature. 3D bioprinting allows customizable tissue-like structures with precise control over cell distribution and bioactive molecule release. Key polysaccharides include alginate, chitosan, hyaluronic acid (HA), cellulose, and dextran. Alginate forms reversible networks via calcium ion cross-linking, suitable for wound dressings and tissue engineering. Chitosan, with amino and hydroxyl groups, exhibits antibacterial activity and promotes cell proliferation, widely used in infected wounds. HA achieves self-healing through dynamic covalent bonds, accelerating collagen deposition and angiogenesis. Cellulose derivatives employ boronic ester or Schiff base linkages for self-healing systems in injectable formulations. Dextran utilizes Diels-Alder reactions for self-healing under physiological conditions, ideal for drug delivery. Commercial products like HyStem® and Chitogel® have entered clinical use, integrating growth factors or antimicrobials to enhance wound healing. However, challenges persist, including insufficient mechanical strength, mismatched degradation rates with healing processes, long-term safety concerns, and scalability. Future directions focus on "smart" hydrogels, combined with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene editing or artificial intelligence (AI)-optimized design, to enhance functionality and clinical translation.

Indexed as

Covalent bondHydrogelsNon-covalent bondPolysaccharidesSelf-healingSkin regenerationTissue healing

Identifiers

PMID42027670
PMCPMC13099947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.