Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027650›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2026

A Realist Review Protocol on the Contribution of  Mental Health First Aider Programmes to Staff Wellbeing within Hospital and associated healthcare settings.

Dolores Donegan, Sean Paul Teeling, Martin McNamara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dolores DoneganUCD School of Nursing and Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sean Paul TeelingUCD School of Nursing and Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4102-7280
Martin McNamaraUCD School of Nursing and Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7257-9654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Staff wellbeing is a growing concerns in healthcare settings, where increased workload, emotional demand, and organisational pressures contribute to stress, burnout, and reduced psychological safety. Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training is an evidence-based programme designed to support early recognition of mental distress, provide initial reassurance, and facilitate signposting to appropriate help. Its specific contribution to staff wellbeing within hospital and associated healthcare settings, however, remains underexplored. This paper presents a protocol for a realist review that will examine how, why, and in what contexts an MHFA programme may support staff wellbeing within hospital and associated healthcare settings. [Table: see text]. Methods: This protocol for a realist review will follow RAMESES standards to examine the contribution of MHFA training to staff health and wellbeing. The review will proceed through five stages: (1) clarifying the scope of the review; (2) developing initial programme theories; (3) searching for evidence; (4) extracting and synthesising data using realist logic; and (5) refining the programme theories. An expert panel will be convened to support the development and refinement of the programme theories as the review progresses. Conclusions This realist review protocol will guide the development of context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations to explain how MHFA training may operate within different hospital contexts. The resulting programme theories may contribute to organisational strategy, leadership practice, and policy decisions aimed at improving staff wellbeing in acute hospital settings.

Indexed as

Healthcare Workers.Hospital StaffMental Health First AidRealist Review ProtocolStaff Wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42027650
PMCPMC13100600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.