ArticleNursing research and practice2026
Development and Evaluation of a Nurse Competency Assessment System for Public Health Emergencies.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Evaluation of a Nurse Competency Assessment System for Public Health Emergencies.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to construct a competency assessment system for nurses working in designated hospitals for public health emergencies, specifically major outbreaks of new respiratory infectious diseases, and to evaluate its usability in order to provide a standardized tool for assessing the skills of nurses caring for patients with such infectious diseases. Methods: The competency assessment index system for nurses in designated hospitals was developed through literature analysis, behavioral interviews, and the Delphi expert consultation method. The weights of the indicators were calculated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions. Subsequently, a satisfaction survey was conducted with 80 nurses from a designated hospital in Tianjin to evaluate the system's usability. Results: The effective response rates of the expert consultation questionnaires for two rounds were 95% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient was 0.902, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) ranged between 0.135 and 0.198 (all Conclusion: The competency assessment system for nurses in designated hospitals for PHEs developed in this study demonstrates strong scientific validity, reliability, and practical value. It provides a scientific basis for the selection, training, and assessment of nurses in designated hospitals for PHEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.