ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2026
Unusual clinical presentation of ameloblastoma: a case report.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 44-year-old male patient presented with persistent ulcer in lower right premolar region. The ulcer was preceded by a swelling which have been misdiagnosed as an abscess and managed by incision and drainage leading to non-healing ulcer. The ulcer managed by excision of the ulcer and complete enucleation of the attached lesion from the bony defect with curettage and reconstructed by bone regeneration procedure and final diagnosis was ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma management starts from simple enucleation and curettage for small lesion to massive resection with safety margin which needs advance surgery for reconstruction of the mouth to restore normal function. What is unique in this case is regeneration of the defect by particulate bone graft and membrane as none of the reported literature utilized the same technique. Healing went uneventful. Patient resumed normal life activity within 2-3 weeks post-operatively ensuring a good quality of life with no sign of recurrence after 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.