Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027504›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026

Outcomes Linked to 3N2+1N1 Sampling by Surgery Type: A Commission on Cancer Lung Cancer Quality Metric.

Alison S Baskin, Haley I Tupper, Varada Sarovar, Jessica Santhakumar, Kian C Banks, Angela Sun, Rachel Wile, Katherine Barnes, Lori C Sakoda, Jeffrey B Velotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison S BaskinDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Haley I TupperDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Varada SarovarDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, California.
Jessica SanthakumarUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Kian C BanksDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco East Bay, Oakland, California.
Angela SunCollege of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Rachel WileUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Katherine BarnesUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Lori C SakodaDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, California.
Jeffrey B VelottaUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2021, the Commission on Cancer implemented Standard 5.8 requiring lymph node sampling from ≥3 mediastinal and ≥1 hilar stations (3N2+1N1) during curative-intent lung cancer resections. Before Standard 5.8, sampling ≥10 lymph nodes was recommended. To date, the optimal nodal sampling strategy is still unknown, particularly for sublobar resections. We assessed 3N2+1N1 sampling patterns and potential associations with recurrence and mortality by resection type. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection (2009-2019). We calculated the proportion with 3N2+1N1 sampled. Using multivariable Cox regression, we assessed associations of 3N2+1N1 sampling with 1-year recurrence and 5-year overall mortality, stratified by lobectomy vs sublobar resection. Results: Among 2096 lobectomy patients, 43% had 3N2+1N1 sampling. In contrast, among 386 sublobar resection patients, 23% had 3N2+1N1. We found 3N2+1N1 sampling was not significantly associated with 1-year recurrence or 5-year mortality after lobectomy, but was associated with reduced 1-year recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98) after sublobar resection. Conclusions: A minority of lobectomy and sublobar resection patients had 3N2+1N1 sampling. Although 3N2+1N1 sampling was not associated with improvements across all outcomes, our findings suggest that Standard 5.8 may be a meaningful step toward improved quality of lymph node evaluations in some patients.

Identifiers

PMID42027504
PMCPMC13100740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.