ArticleTanaffos2025
Traditional and Short Course Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Comparative Study in National Referral Centers.
Article in Tanaffos, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is difficult, expensive, and requires prolonged periods of time. Recent studies recommended short-course therapy (shorter regimen) for 9 months to one year. This study aimed to evaluate the response of the short-course therapy compared with traditional treatment in MDR-TB patients. Materials and Methods: From all 94 referred MDR-TB cases, 48 patients were included in this study. Shorter regimen consisted of Moxifloxacin, Prothionamide, Amikacin, Clofazimine, Linezolid, Ethambutol, Pyrazinamide, and Cycloserine, and longer regimens consisted of the mentioned drugs, except Clofazimine and Linezolid, were prescribed randomly: in equal (24 in each group). The patients were monitored and evaluated for any complications and were followed for five years for relapse. Results: The median age was 39 years. The median interval for smear conversion was 30 days (20- 58 days) and was shorter in the short-course group (36 vs. 49 days). Also, the mean interval of sputum culture conversion in the shorter group and standard was 32 and 56 days, respectively, which is not related to the outcome of treatment. Eight of twelve patients who developed severe adverse effects were in shorter regimen. There was no difference between the two groups for the outcome of TB treatment. There is no relation between the outcome and other factors. None of them relapsed after three years following the end of the treatment. Conclusion: Shorter treatment can increase the cure rate and cooperation and adherence of the patients. It would be better to consider a shorter regimen in the national TB program for strengthening favorable treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42027441PMC13102292What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.