Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027392›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

3D-bioprinting for joint regeneration.

Weida Li, Yi Wang, Yue Cui, Qiang Wu, Pu Ying, Kerong Dai, Ye Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weida Li *Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yi Wang *Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yue Cui *Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Qiang WuShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Pu YingDepartment of Orthopaedics, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Changshu, China.
Kerong DaiShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ye SunDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint injuries represent a significant clinical challenge with limited regenerative options. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a transformative technology, enabling the precise fabrication of patient-specific, anatomically matched, multilayered scaffolds that replicate the complex structure and gradient of natural joint tissues. This review comprehensively summarizes advances in bioprinting techniques, cell sources, and biomaterial formulations, emphasizing cell-laden bioinks composed of biomaterials and viable cells to create functional, bioactive constructs. Beyond basic fabrication, we evaluate the functional performance of bioprinted cartilage, bone, and ligaments, and we discuss strategies for engineering osteochondral interfaces and ligament-bone interfaces to support biomimetic mechanical properties and tissue integration. We further compare major printing modalities, including extrusion-based printing, inkjet, and laser-assisted bioprinting, and we discuss how modality-specific trade-offs in resolution, viscosity window, and cell stress influence construct fidelity and repair outcomes. In addition, we examine biofunctionalization strategies that incorporate growth factors, stem cells, and exosomes to enhance regenerative signaling and matrix remodeling. Notably, 3D bioprinting for joint regeneration is transitioning from bench to bedside, and we detail the current landscape of clinical translation, including commercialized products like Nanochon and active clinical trials for knee and hip repair. However, challenges such as insufficient vascularization and the mechanical performance of the printed constructions remain significant hurdles for clinical translation. Overall, this work underscores the potential of personalized 3D bioprinted scaffolds to advance joint tissue engineering and clarifies key directions for integrating these technologies into clinical practice.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingadditive componentsbiomaterialscellsregeneration

Identifiers

PMID42027392
PMCPMC13099821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.