Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027368›Full record

ReviewInnovations in clinical neuroscience

Social Media Use and Technology Use in Patients with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Larrilyn Grant, Lexi Singh, Anisha Mandava

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Larrilyn GrantAll authors are with the Wright State, University Boonshoft School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.
Lexi SinghAll authors are with the Wright State, University Boonshoft School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.
Anisha MandavaAll authors are with the Wright State, University Boonshoft School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As internet and social media use become increasingly central to youth development, it is critical to address the unique opportunities and challenges these technologies pose for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). This column explores how digital tools can enhance social connection, identity formation, adaptive skill-building, and access to therapeutic resources in youth with IDD, while also acknowledging the heightened risks of cyberbullying, overstimulation, exploitation, and digital exclusion. Through a review of current literature, clinical vignettes, and practical guidance, we offer a nuanced framework for clinicians to promote safe, inclusive, and developmentally appropriate internet use. We highlight the importance of caregiver support, tailored digital tools, and mental health-informed approaches to digital literacy. Clinicians are encouraged to integrate technology discussions into care planning, advocate for accessible digital environments, and empower youth with IDD to participate meaningfully in the digital world.

Indexed as

caregiver supportcyberbullyingdigital inclusionintellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD)internet useonline safetysocial connectednesssocial media

Identifiers

PMID42027368
PMCPMC13101901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.